與什麼相比的英語短語

　　與他想必的話，你的琴藝還沒學到家呢。下面是小編給大家整理的的相關知識，供大家參閱!

　　篇1

　　1. CBS's ratings again showed huge improvement over the previous year.

　　與前一年相比，哥倫比亞廣播公司的收視率再次大幅提高。

　　2. Marseilles has proved to be a better racial melting pot than Lyons.

　　事實證明，與里昂相比，馬賽是一個更好的種族大熔爐。

　　3. She'smuch happier performing live than in a recording studio.

　　與在錄音棚裡錄音相比，她更喜歡現場表演。

　　4. Ferries are very powerful and manoeuvrable compared to cargo ships.

　　與貨船相比，渡船馬力大而且易操縱。

　　5. Was it fair to compare independent schools with state schools?

　　拿私立學校與州立學校相比，這樣公平嗎?

　　6. He makes unfavourable comparisons between British and French cooking.

　　他認為與法國菜相比，英國菜相形見絀。

　　7. Is the human heart weak in comparison with the other organs?

　　與其他器官相比，人的心臟是不是很脆弱?

　　8. Columbia was a young city compared to venerable Charleston.

　　與歷史悠久的查爾斯頓相比，哥倫比亞是個年輕的城市。

　　9. Their lives are a far cry from his own poor childhood.

　　他們的生活與他那貧苦的童年生活相比大相徑庭。

　　10. She learned to stop putting herself down and comparing herself to others.

　　她學會了不再自我貶低，拿自己與別人相比。

　　11. Poor sleepers take longer to fall asleep than good sleepers.

　　與睡眠好的人相比，睡眠不好的人要花更長的時間才能入睡。

　　12. Emerald starlings are fairly small when compared with other such birds.

　　與同類的其他鳥相比，翠輝椋鳥要小很多。

　　13. The cost was peanuts compared to a new kitchen.

　　與建新廚房相比，那筆費用微不足道。

　　14. He's good company, as small boys go.

　　與其他小男孩相比，他挺好相處。

　　15. German banks have more insider knowledge than most.

　　德國銀行與大多數銀行相比知曉更多的內部訊息。

　　篇2

　　正如上面提到的，與Axis1.x相比，Axis2構建於全新的體系結構之上。

　　As mentioned above, Axis2 is built on a completely new architecture as compared with Axis 1.x.

　　正如上面提到的，Axis2也具有處理程式的概念，但與Axis1.x相比，指定和部署處理程式的方式有一些變化。

　　As mentioned above, Axis2 also has the concept of handler but when compared to Axis 1.x there are few changes in the way you specify and deploy handlers.

　　在圖1 中，與Domino 6.5相比，可以看到R6inotes虛擬使用者所需CPU資源實質性的減少。

　　In figure 1, you will see a substantial reduction in CPU resources required for an R6inotes virtualuser, compared to what we had with Domino 6.5.

　　說不使用要更容易一些：如果與XML1.0相比帶來的受益很小，或者把資料儲存到XML 1.0的方法很脆弱或者容易丟失，那麼就不使用。

　　It's certainly easy to say when not to use one: when the incremental benefit over XML 1.0 is small, or the route to preserving your data in XML 1.0 is fragile or lossy.

　　與XHTML1.0相比，這種安排更符合邏輯，其他很多標記詞彙表的使用者對此也很熟悉。

　　This is a much more logical arrangement than in XHTML 1.0, and will be familiar to users ofmany other markup vocabularies.

　　您也知道，與AIX5.1相比，AIX 5.2更加優秀、也更加穩定。

　　If you recall, AIX 5.2 was a lot better and more stable than AIX 5.1.

　　通常，使用者數越大，Domino7與Domino6.5相比具有更大的效能提高。

　　Generally, the more users, the better the improvement for Domino 7 compared with Domino 6.5.

　　在本文的結尾部分，我們展示了與Domino6.5相比，執行在所有平臺上的Domino 7增加了基準測試使用者數量。

　　To this end, we have shown increased benchmark users running on all platforms, compared to the number of users with Domino 6.5.

　　隨著可伸縮性的增強，與Domino6.5相比，Domino7減少了處理相同數量的使用者時所需要的CPU 資源數量。

　　Along with this increase in scalability, Domino 7 has reduced the amount of CPU needed tohandle an equal number of users, compared to Domino 6.5.

　　這個測試以及以前的測試，有效地證明了與Domino6.5相比，Domino7在可伸縮性、效能和TCO 方面的改進。

　　This, and previous tests, confirm that Domino 7 improves on the scalability, performance, andTCO, when compared to Domino 6.5.

　　與del.icio.us相比，digg和Reddit更側重於自己的頁面設計，但使用者仍可對其站點進行定製和控制。

　　and Reddit might be more focused on their Web pages than, say, del.icio.us, but users can stillgain a measure of customization and control over these sites.

　　篇3

　　下表顯示了Domino7與Domino6.5相比CPU 效能改進的百分比

　　The following table shows the percent of CPU improvement for Domino 7 compared to Domino6.5

　　使用更少的CPU資源，節省記憶體，並且支援的使用者數增加了 50%。與Domino6.5相比，Domino7在可伸縮性、效能和TCO 方面繼續得到改進。

　　With lower CPU usage, improved memory savings, and an increase of 50 percent more userssupported, Domino 7 continues to improve on the scalability, performance, and TCO when compared to Domino 6.5.

　　Expedia和它的姊妹公司Hotels在傳統房間的價格方面與Booking相比具有一定的競爭力，但酒店網站上顯示出的特大床房的價格卻和Priceline一樣。

　　Expedia and sister site Hotels offer traditional rooms at comparable rates to Booking’swhile the hotel website’s rate for the room with the king bed is the same as Priceline’s.

　　與Domino6.5相比，在z/OS 上使用Domino7 來執行郵件基準測試可以總共改進 25%到 30%***詳見下表***。

　　The total improvement when running the mail benchmark test is 25 to 30 percent for Domino 7on z/OS, compared to Domino 6.5 ***details follow***.

　　僅僅利用這些改進，z/OS上的Domino7 與Domino6.5相比就可以對CPU利用率改進 17%到 20%。

　　With these changes alone, Domino 7 on z/OS shows a 17 to 20 percent CPU utilizationimprovement compared to Domino 6.5.

　　與 digg 相比，Reddit 的介面簡單得多***您可能會說這個介面太過 “實際”，但這並非壞事***，由於摘要更為簡短，因此就能列出更多的頭條新聞故事。

　　The Reddit interface is much simpler ***"utilitarian", you might say, but this can be a good thing***, and more of the top stories are listed because of the briefer summaries.

　　如圖1所示，在相同的模擬使用者數量下，相同的時間內執行相同的工作負載，結果顯示Domino7與Domino6.5 相比減少了 27% 的CPU 資源佔用。

　　As figure 1 shows, the same number of simulated users, running the same workload for thesame amount of time, results in a 27 percent reduction in CPU usage between Domino 7 andDomino 6.5.

　　在7000 個使用者的負載級別上，Domino7與Domino6.5 相比，顯示了顯著的CPU佔用節省。

　　Domino 7 has shown significant reduction in CPU utilization vs. Domino 6.5, at the 7000 userload level.

　　如圖6所示，與Domino6.5相比，可以看到 R6iNotes虛擬使用者所需CPU 的資源有實質性的減少。

　　As figure 6 shows, we found a substantial reduction in CPU resources required for an R6iNotesvirtual user, compared to what we had with Domino 6.5.

　　在最多包含4000 個使用者的多個數據點上，Domino7與Domino6.5 相比CPU資源佔用都減少了***參見圖2***。

　　Domino 7 produced reduction in CPU utilization vs. Domino 6.5, at multiple data points, up toand including 4000 mail users ***see figure 2***.

　　正如可以從這些基準測試資料中可以發現的一樣，在Windows2003EnterpriseServer 上執行的Domino7 與Domino6.5相比有幾個方面的效能優勢。

　　As you can observe from our benchmark data, Domino 7 running on Windows 2003 EnterpriseServer has several significant performance advantages over Domino 6.5.

　　與Domino6.5相比，Domino7在 10,000 個使用者負載的情況下對CPU 的佔用率有了很大的改進。

　　Domino 7 shows significant reduction in CPU utilization vs. Domino 6.5, at the 10,000 user loadlevel.

　　Akka 1.1的預設排程程式與1.0相比有哪些改善呢;HawtDispatch 在哪些地方更有用或者更快呢?

　　InfoQ: How was the Akka 1.1 default dispatcher improved over 1.0; where is HawtDispatch usefulor faster?

　　在圖5 中，與Domino 6.5 相比，將看到R6iNotes虛擬使用者所需的CPU資源有實質性的減少。

　　In figure 5, you will see a substantial reduction in CPU resources required for an R6iNotes virtualuser, compared to what we had with Domino 6.5.

　　與LDAP5.2 相比，ITDS是一個改進的版本。

　　ITDS is a beautified release compared to LDAP5.2. Some important features are

　　與Domino6.5相比，使用mail6.ntf和mail7.ntf 模板的Domino7 都得到了較大的效能改進。

　　Domino 7 improved CPU with both mail6.ntf and mail7.ntf compared to Domino 6.5.

　　實驗結果表明，該方法在防止誤差積累方面與G.729相比，效能有明顯的提高。

　　Simulation tests indicate that the new method is better than the standard technology used in G.729.

　　實驗結果表明，該方法在防止誤差積累方面與G.729相比，效能有明顯的提高。

　　Simulation tests indicate that the new method is better than the standard technology used in G.729.

看過的相關知識的人還：